<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SEMs and Traditional Agencies Working Together</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2006/11/sems-and-agencies-working-together.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2006/11/sems-and-agencies-working-together.html</link>
	<description>Featuring news, opinion and commentary related to the industry of search engines and marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:12:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ammon</title>
		<link>http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2006/11/sems-and-agencies-working-together.html/comment-page-1#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Ammon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 13:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.133.136.242/blog/?p=238#comment-89</guid>
		<description>Coincidentally, the comments on my first post on the SEOmoz blog touched on some of the issues around agencies and SEOs.

In those comments however, people were more looking at the SEO companies being bought out by big media agencies, which in my experience is never good.  An agency that buys an SEO company to provide what it doesn&#039;t understand is never going to manage that asset correctly.

I think partnerships are the far more successful model, and as you so rightly identify, need to incorporate a large amount of support and training to the agency on what SEO is, what it can do, and how it can work effectively as an integral part of the marketing mix.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[89<p><span itemprop="commentText">Coincidentally, the comments on my first post on the SEOmoz blog touched on some of the issues around agencies and SEOs.</p>
<p>In those comments however, people were more looking at the SEO companies being bought out by big media agencies, which in my experience is never good.  An agency that buys an SEO company to provide what it doesn&#8217;t understand is never going to manage that asset correctly.</p>
<p>I think partnerships are the far more successful model, and as you so rightly identify, need to incorporate a large amount of support and training to the agency on what SEO is, what it can do, and how it can work effectively as an integral part of the marketing mix.</span><meta itemprop="commentTime" content="2006-11-29T08:50:41+00:00" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

