<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s Undetected Click Fraud Rate Less Than 2%</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2006/12/google-click-fraud-rate.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2006/12/google-click-fraud-rate.html</link>
	<description>Featuring news, opinion and commentary related to the industry of search engines and marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 06:19:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Neil Matthews</title>
		<link>http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2006/12/google-click-fraud-rate.html/comment-page-1#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Matthews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 07:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.133.136.242/blog/?p=250#comment-108</guid>
		<description>I think the 20% most click fraud companies quote is the invalid click rate, with 2% of 20% undetected click fraud.

That is still a whole load of clicks.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the 20% most click fraud companies quote is the invalid click rate, with 2% of 20% undetected click fraud.</p>
<p>That is still a whole load of clicks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
