<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should SMBs Be Worried About Google&#8217;s Universal Search?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2007/07/should_smbs_be_worried_about_g.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2007/07/should_smbs_be_worried_about_g.html</link>
	<description>Featuring news, opinion and commentary related to the industry of search engines and marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 06:19:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alexey</title>
		<link>http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2007/07/should_smbs_be_worried_about_g.html/comment-page-1#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 02:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.133.136.242/blog/?p=380#comment-184</guid>
		<description>I sure hope they will just stick will the original vision of keeping the search natural. I think most searchers will look past the fluff and get to local good stuff.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sure hope they will just stick will the original vision of keeping the search natural. I think most searchers will look past the fluff and get to local good stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Alan Effinger</title>
		<link>http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2007/07/should_smbs_be_worried_about_g.html/comment-page-1#comment-183</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Alan Effinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 01:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.133.136.242/blog/?p=380#comment-183</guid>
		<description>Wonderfully compelling post, David.

As the former Chief Evangelist for PRWeb, we often spent much of our time explaining to our clients how important EVERY element of your on and off-page media is to search results.

Universal and 3D search is here to stay. It just makes sense as our online world tries to make sense of rich content.

We&#039;ve actually developed a media broadcast engine that provides what we call &quot;Permanent Media Placement&quot;, specifically for Universal Search (we had a bit of an inside view of this at PRWeb).

If you get a moment, drop by the site or give me a ring and we can talk about how we believe there&#039;s a very specific method to this media madness.

Thanks for the great, pragmatic piece.

Warm regards,
Mark Alan Effinger
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.RichContent.tv&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.RichContent.tv&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonderfully compelling post, David.</p>
<p>As the former Chief Evangelist for PRWeb, we often spent much of our time explaining to our clients how important EVERY element of your on and off-page media is to search results.</p>
<p>Universal and 3D search is here to stay. It just makes sense as our online world tries to make sense of rich content.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve actually developed a media broadcast engine that provides what we call &#8220;Permanent Media Placement&#8221;, specifically for Universal Search (we had a bit of an inside view of this at PRWeb).</p>
<p>If you get a moment, drop by the site or give me a ring and we can talk about how we believe there&#8217;s a very specific method to this media madness.</p>
<p>Thanks for the great, pragmatic piece.</p>
<p>Warm regards,<br />
Mark Alan Effinger<br />
<a href="http://www.RichContent.tv" rel="nofollow">http://www.RichContent.tv</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
