<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SEO Myth: All Reciprocal Links Are Bad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2007/10/seo-myth-reciprocal-links-are-bad.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2007/10/seo-myth-reciprocal-links-are-bad.html</link>
	<description>Featuring news, opinion and commentary related to the industry of search engines and marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 06:19:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alice</title>
		<link>http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2007/10/seo-myth-reciprocal-links-are-bad.html/comment-page-1#comment-591</link>
		<dc:creator>Alice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 00:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.133.136.242/blog/?p=419#comment-591</guid>
		<description>People generally compare the importance of Reciprocal and One Way Linking. From Search Engine perspective one way linking is definitely better; it is harder to do however. Either One-Way Linking or Reciprocal, both have their own advantages and both can make your existence effulgent. However, the factor that matters the most is the quality of links. Quality Link Building refers to getting links over relevant site and having quality content. If you are looking forward to make brand exposure, ensure that you choose quality Link Building.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People generally compare the importance of Reciprocal and One Way Linking. From Search Engine perspective one way linking is definitely better; it is harder to do however. Either One-Way Linking or Reciprocal, both have their own advantages and both can make your existence effulgent. However, the factor that matters the most is the quality of links. Quality Link Building refers to getting links over relevant site and having quality content. If you are looking forward to make brand exposure, ensure that you choose quality Link Building.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Java Tutor</title>
		<link>http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2007/10/seo-myth-reciprocal-links-are-bad.html/comment-page-1#comment-482</link>
		<dc:creator>Java Tutor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 04:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.133.136.242/blog/?p=419#comment-482</guid>
		<description>No, reciprocal links and one way links work just the same. The reason why some people think that reciprocal links don&#039;t work is that many webmasters who engage in reciprocal linking don&#039;t care about theming but only about the number of links. One way links are usually from topic-related sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, reciprocal links and one way links work just the same. The reason why some people think that reciprocal links don&#8217;t work is that many webmasters who engage in reciprocal linking don&#8217;t care about theming but only about the number of links. One way links are usually from topic-related sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web counters</title>
		<link>http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2007/10/seo-myth-reciprocal-links-are-bad.html/comment-page-1#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator>Web counters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 08:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.133.136.242/blog/?p=419#comment-220</guid>
		<description>I have read your SEO blogs and a couple of those you listed and I am pretty much sure that if you follow them right,There are lots of people who get on the internet hoping that they will be able to learn how to attract new customers (it allows them to directly be in the page they were looking for).fast, but most usually without a clue as to where to start.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have read your SEO blogs and a couple of those you listed and I am pretty much sure that if you follow them right,There are lots of people who get on the internet hoping that they will be able to learn how to attract new customers (it allows them to directly be in the page they were looking for).fast, but most usually without a clue as to where to start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: samantha</title>
		<link>http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2007/10/seo-myth-reciprocal-links-are-bad.html/comment-page-1#comment-219</link>
		<dc:creator>samantha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 05:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.133.136.242/blog/?p=419#comment-219</guid>
		<description>great article! here I found another one regarding seo myths that will interest you too. Take a look at that
&lt;a href=&quot;http://seodocs.blogspot.com/2008/05/search-engine-optimization-myths.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://seodocs.blogspot.com/2008/05/search-engine-optimization-myths.html&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great article! here I found another one regarding seo myths that will interest you too. Take a look at that<br />
<a href="http://seodocs.blogspot.com/2008/05/search-engine-optimization-myths.html" rel="nofollow">http://seodocs.blogspot.com/2008/05/search-engine-optimization-myths.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flashy Flashy</title>
		<link>http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2007/10/seo-myth-reciprocal-links-are-bad.html/comment-page-1#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>Flashy Flashy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 14:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.133.136.242/blog/?p=419#comment-218</guid>
		<description>&quot;google threatens us of punishing for link exchanges and gets what it wants.&quot;

I do agree ,reciprocal links (site to site) carry weight,unless they are page to page links.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;google threatens us of punishing for link exchanges and gets what it wants.&#8221;</p>
<p>I do agree ,reciprocal links (site to site) carry weight,unless they are page to page links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2007/10/seo-myth-reciprocal-links-are-bad.html/comment-page-1#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 11:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.133.136.242/blog/?p=419#comment-217</guid>
		<description>Well Resiprocal links for now has nothing but positive effect when we talk about Search Enging Ranking and espicially in Google  &amp; Yahoo ... However, its could be a really tough task for newbie internet marketeers.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Resiprocal links for now has nothing but positive effect when we talk about Search Enging Ranking and espicially in Google  &#038; Yahoo &#8230; However, its could be a really tough task for newbie internet marketeers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Desmond Haynes</title>
		<link>http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2007/10/seo-myth-reciprocal-links-are-bad.html/comment-page-1#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>Desmond Haynes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 09:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.133.136.242/blog/?p=419#comment-216</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this post. Popular belief, forum talks are always pointing to the wrong direction(s)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this post. Popular belief, forum talks are always pointing to the wrong direction(s)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yahrah</title>
		<link>http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2007/10/seo-myth-reciprocal-links-are-bad.html/comment-page-1#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>yahrah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 23:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.133.136.242/blog/?p=419#comment-215</guid>
		<description>Link exchange is fine as long as the link is relevant to your site.. or else it will end up as link farming.. which is prone on penalize by Google.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Link exchange is fine as long as the link is relevant to your site.. or else it will end up as link farming.. which is prone on penalize by Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alfred Malveo</title>
		<link>http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2007/10/seo-myth-reciprocal-links-are-bad.html/comment-page-1#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>Alfred Malveo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 04:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.133.136.242/blog/?p=419#comment-214</guid>
		<description>Link exchanging has certainly lost favor and some SEO consultants don&#039;t do link exchanges period. I am also of the mind that link exchanges don&#039;t count for much, but I also know that link exchanges can be part of a big SEO strategy.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Link exchanging has certainly lost favor and some SEO consultants don&#8217;t do link exchanges period. I am also of the mind that link exchanges don&#8217;t count for much, but I also know that link exchanges can be part of a big SEO strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2007/10/seo-myth-reciprocal-links-are-bad.html/comment-page-1#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 00:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.133.136.242/blog/?p=419#comment-213</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s funny, on the one hand I&#039;d like more people to know this because I&#039;d have more people to trade links with. But on the other hand, if everyone knew this, it&#039;d make it harder to beat the competition. So, in a way, I appreciate the negative hype on link trades. But the fact of the matter is that the right trades do work and they work very well, and I have a number of sites that prove the point.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s funny, on the one hand I&#8217;d like more people to know this because I&#8217;d have more people to trade links with. But on the other hand, if everyone knew this, it&#8217;d make it harder to beat the competition. So, in a way, I appreciate the negative hype on link trades. But the fact of the matter is that the right trades do work and they work very well, and I have a number of sites that prove the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
