<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Government Steps Up Efforts To Access Any Email or Web Search Data</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2008/01/government-steps-up-efforts-to-spy-on-americans.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2008/01/government-steps-up-efforts-to-spy-on-americans.html</link>
	<description>Featuring news, opinion and commentary related to the industry of search engines and marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:12:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince</title>
		<link>http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2008/01/government-steps-up-efforts-to-spy-on-americans.html/comment-page-1#comment-291</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.133.136.242/blog/?p=466#comment-291</guid>
		<description>I agree that it&#039;s pretty hard to have privacy nowadays. About the &quot;why fear if you have nothing to hide.&quot; question, there was a debate on the Bruce Schneier blog recently and many arguments were quite relevant.

Now, how to protect? So far we used anonymity to protect privacy, but considering all this intrusion, it&#039;ll be quite hard. Personally, I use obfuscation tools. It means that instead of hiding what I do, I&#039;ll show what I do and what I pretend to do. For instance, to keep secret about the &quot;Sex and the city» movie (I&#039;m not fan), I heard they&#039;ve made some fake movie scenes in public places. So you have no way to distinguish between false rumors and true rumors. You can do the exactly same thing about your web browsing.

Especially, I’m developing a FF plug-in that generates fake searches (see my website). The same thing can be done for every kind of traffic, not only web searches.

Definitely, we have to forget about anonymity…

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[291<p><span itemprop="commentText">I agree that it&#8217;s pretty hard to have privacy nowadays. About the &#8220;why fear if you have nothing to hide.&#8221; question, there was a debate on the Bruce Schneier blog recently and many arguments were quite relevant.</p>
<p>Now, how to protect? So far we used anonymity to protect privacy, but considering all this intrusion, it&#8217;ll be quite hard. Personally, I use obfuscation tools. It means that instead of hiding what I do, I&#8217;ll show what I do and what I pretend to do. For instance, to keep secret about the &#8220;Sex and the city» movie (I&#8217;m not fan), I heard they&#8217;ve made some fake movie scenes in public places. So you have no way to distinguish between false rumors and true rumors. You can do the exactly same thing about your web browsing.</p>
<p>Especially, I’m developing a FF plug-in that generates fake searches (see my website). The same thing can be done for every kind of traffic, not only web searches.</p>
<p>Definitely, we have to forget about anonymity…</span><meta itemprop="commentTime" content="2008-01-17T13:57:28+00:00" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Wallace</title>
		<link>http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2008/01/government-steps-up-efforts-to-spy-on-americans.html/comment-page-1#comment-290</link>
		<dc:creator>David Wallace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.133.136.242/blog/?p=466#comment-290</guid>
		<description>So Agent Smith, you seem to fall under the category of &quot;why fear if you have nothing to hide.&quot; I&#039;m all for nabbing terrorists, kiddie porn freaks and the like. I think it is the &quot;no warrant required&quot; aspect that is a little scary. At least with a warrant, there has to be probable cause to prey into someone&#039;s privacy. Strip away the need for a warrant and all are left naked.

Maybe that might not be so bad as far as online data goes but what happens when the government wants to put tracking devices on our vehicles so we can be automatically issued speeding tickets when exceeding the legally posted speed limits? Or maybe track the amount of energy we use or food we eat and fine us when they feel it is excessive?

Those may be extreme examples of government control but many a times, seizing control over something is a step by step process. A little here, a little there until before you know it, complete control is obtained.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[290<p><span itemprop="commentText">So Agent Smith, you seem to fall under the category of &#8220;why fear if you have nothing to hide.&#8221; I&#8217;m all for nabbing terrorists, kiddie porn freaks and the like. I think it is the &#8220;no warrant required&#8221; aspect that is a little scary. At least with a warrant, there has to be probable cause to prey into someone&#8217;s privacy. Strip away the need for a warrant and all are left naked.</p>
<p>Maybe that might not be so bad as far as online data goes but what happens when the government wants to put tracking devices on our vehicles so we can be automatically issued speeding tickets when exceeding the legally posted speed limits? Or maybe track the amount of energy we use or food we eat and fine us when they feel it is excessive?</p>
<p>Those may be extreme examples of government control but many a times, seizing control over something is a step by step process. A little here, a little there until before you know it, complete control is obtained.</span><meta itemprop="commentTime" content="2008-01-16T09:55:43+00:00" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agent Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2008/01/government-steps-up-efforts-to-spy-on-americans.html/comment-page-1#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>Agent Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.133.136.242/blog/?p=466#comment-289</guid>
		<description>So what? The government knows you are surfing porn and resending the same chain mail you sent last week. Big whoop.

Either this means nothing (privacy itself isn&#039;t really anything we need to protect in the forever bemoaning repetitive knee jerk fashion) or you are one of the people we need to track with this sort of behavior. Its as simple as that.

What is more important to us; safety and the ability to thwart kiddy fiddlers and terrorists or the certainty that out banal and dull emails and telephone conversations are kept secret from the people we choose to let protect us?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[289<p><span itemprop="commentText">So what? The government knows you are surfing porn and resending the same chain mail you sent last week. Big whoop.</p>
<p>Either this means nothing (privacy itself isn&#8217;t really anything we need to protect in the forever bemoaning repetitive knee jerk fashion) or you are one of the people we need to track with this sort of behavior. Its as simple as that.</p>
<p>What is more important to us; safety and the ability to thwart kiddy fiddlers and terrorists or the certainty that out banal and dull emails and telephone conversations are kept secret from the people we choose to let protect us?</span><meta itemprop="commentTime" content="2008-01-16T08:49:21+00:00" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

