<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Can&#8217;t Google Be More Like Ask.com?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2008/01/why-cant-google-be-more-like-ask.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2008/01/why-cant-google-be-more-like-ask.html</link>
	<description>Featuring news, opinion and commentary related to the industry of search engines and marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 08:22:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roe</title>
		<link>http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2008/01/why-cant-google-be-more-like-ask.html/comment-page-1#comment-285</link>
		<dc:creator>Roe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 13:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.133.136.242/blog/?p=460#comment-285</guid>
		<description>By punishing those who buy or sell links to get a higher ranking, Google is attacking one of the fundamental elements of the free market. However, that element in many cases is one of the fundamental &lt;i&gt;problems&lt;/i&gt; with the free market -- especially in this case, where the saturation of big-budget businesses in the SERPs is not necessarily (and usually not) beneficial to the end user.

Maybe the solution is not just punishing the link buyers and sellers, but re-evaluating how much weight is put on the number of links.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By punishing those who buy or sell links to get a higher ranking, Google is attacking one of the fundamental elements of the free market. However, that element in many cases is one of the fundamental <i>problems</i> with the free market &#8212; especially in this case, where the saturation of big-budget businesses in the SERPs is not necessarily (and usually not) beneficial to the end user.</p>
<p>Maybe the solution is not just punishing the link buyers and sellers, but re-evaluating how much weight is put on the number of links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2008/01/why-cant-google-be-more-like-ask.html/comment-page-1#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.133.136.242/blog/?p=460#comment-284</guid>
		<description>Google started the game then decided to start changing the rules... moving the goal posts.  Hey, when you have a slice of the market that large you can do what ever you want.

Ask knowing that they aren&#039;t going to be able to get the webmasters to jump and dance with their 5% of the market simply made a better engine.

Clients only know Google.  When they want a &quot;first page ranking&quot; they really want a top 10 Google Ranking.  Good to Google for coming up with a business model and product that is so well marketed.  But they have sold a lemon.

That leaves us with 2 options: 1. make lemonade or 2. ask for the tequila and the salt.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google started the game then decided to start changing the rules&#8230; moving the goal posts.  Hey, when you have a slice of the market that large you can do what ever you want.</p>
<p>Ask knowing that they aren&#8217;t going to be able to get the webmasters to jump and dance with their 5% of the market simply made a better engine.</p>
<p>Clients only know Google.  When they want a &#8220;first page ranking&#8221; they really want a top 10 Google Ranking.  Good to Google for coming up with a business model and product that is so well marketed.  But they have sold a lemon.</p>
<p>That leaves us with 2 options: 1. make lemonade or 2. ask for the tequila and the salt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jumpions</title>
		<link>http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2008/01/why-cant-google-be-more-like-ask.html/comment-page-1#comment-283</link>
		<dc:creator>Jumpions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 05:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.133.136.242/blog/?p=460#comment-283</guid>
		<description>I am not sure about their solution because will mean the richer guys will get the top spots on their searches.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sure about their solution because will mean the richer guys will get the top spots on their searches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John White</title>
		<link>http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2008/01/why-cant-google-be-more-like-ask.html/comment-page-1#comment-282</link>
		<dc:creator>John White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 06:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.133.136.242/blog/?p=460#comment-282</guid>
		<description>Completely agree! I don&#039;t understand why google always changes all of the rules

Has anyone ever used Nemeas to help create profitable websites?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Completely agree! I don&#8217;t understand why google always changes all of the rules</p>
<p>Has anyone ever used Nemeas to help create profitable websites?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sergey Rusak</title>
		<link>http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2008/01/why-cant-google-be-more-like-ask.html/comment-page-1#comment-281</link>
		<dc:creator>Sergey Rusak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.133.136.242/blog/?p=460#comment-281</guid>
		<description>I am actually agree with Google position about paid links.
WIth link maket it looks more like &quot;rich getting richer&quot;.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am actually agree with Google position about paid links.<br />
WIth link maket it looks more like &#8220;rich getting richer&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Reeves</title>
		<link>http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2008/01/why-cant-google-be-more-like-ask.html/comment-page-1#comment-280</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Reeves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 13:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.133.136.242/blog/?p=460#comment-280</guid>
		<description>I agree with that completely. I actually like using Ask over Google when searching. Unfortunately, searching Google is a requirement as no clients are interested in being on the first page of Ask, at this time.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with that completely. I actually like using Ask over Google when searching. Unfortunately, searching Google is a requirement as no clients are interested in being on the first page of Ask, at this time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
