<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SearchRank Blog &#187; DoubleClick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchrank.com/blog/tag/DoubleClick/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchrank.com/blog</link>
	<description>Featuring news, opinion and commentary related to the industry of search engines and marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 14:49:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://www.searchrank.com/blog/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>What Are Google&#8217;s Intentions With the Acquisition of DoubleClick?</title>
		<link>http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2007/06/googles-intentions-with-doubleclick.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2007/06/googles-intentions-with-doubleclick.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 17:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Wallace</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DoubleClick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.133.136.242/blog/?p=372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alex Kinnier, a Group Product Manager at Google, has shed some additional light on why Google went after DoubleClick in April of this year, an acquisition that is still in process of completing. The post first of all provides a short history lesson on how online advertising ha evolved since its birth. We then are reminded what ad serving actually is and how it works. Before revealing the exact reasons why Google is buying DoubleClkick, the author points out some differences between the two companies - Google sells ads while DoubleClick provides ad serving.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2007/06/googles-intentions-with-doubleclick.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Wins the Battle to Acquire DoubleClick</title>
		<link>http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2007/04/google-wins-battle-to-acquire-doubleclick.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2007/04/google-wins-battle-to-acquire-doubleclick.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 15:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Wallace</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acquisitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DoubleClick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.133.136.242/blog/?p=325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am just barely back in Phoenix after SES New York and what do I see all over the place in my feeds this morning? News that Google has won the acquisition of DoubleClick. The price tag rivals their recent acquisition of YouTube - $3.1 billion in cash! I don't typically like to rehash news but this is big. So what does this mean for Google advertisers? What does it mean for their competitors? A few summaries from various sources that might provide a clue.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2007/04/google-wins-battle-to-acquire-doubleclick.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

 Served from: www.searchrank.com @ 2013-05-18 22:14:02 by W3 Total Cache -->