<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SearchRank Blog &#187; Business.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchrank.com/blog/tag/businesscom/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchrank.com/blog</link>
	<description>Featuring news, opinion and commentary related to the industry of search engines and marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:33:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://www.searchrank.com/blog/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>A Deeper Look Into the Workings of Business.com</title>
		<link>http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2007/06/deeper-look-into-business-dot-com.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2007/06/deeper-look-into-business-dot-com.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Wallace</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Directories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.133.136.242/blog/?p=366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeff Behrendt of Aviva Directory has put together an interview with Jessica Bowman, Director of Search Engine Optimization at Business.com. She is their in-house SEO and also frequently writes for Search Engine Land, Search Engine Watch and Search Engine Journal. The interview sheds some light on her duties managing SEO for such a large site as well as a look into how the directory itself is run.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2007/06/deeper-look-into-business-dot-com.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Business.com Makes Things Right</title>
		<link>http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2006/07/businesscom_makes_things_right_1.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2006/07/businesscom_makes_things_right_1.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 16:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Wallace</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Directories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nofollow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.133.136.242/blog/?p=167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A couple of weeks ago I wrote about Business.com's practice of using "nofollow" attributes on editorial listings within their directory but did not use them on the paid listings, a backwards procedure for what the attribute was originally intended for. Today they have decided to stop using the attribute altogether.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2006/07/businesscom_makes_things_right_1.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Business.com Bass Ackwards Use of &#8220;nofollow&#8221; Attribute</title>
		<link>http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2006/07/businesscom-bass-ackwards-use-of-nofollow-attribute.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2006/07/businesscom-bass-ackwards-use-of-nofollow-attribute.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 18:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Wallace</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Directories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nofollow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.133.136.242/blog/?p=160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Via Threadwatch, it appears that Business.com has attached the rel="nofollow" attribute to its editorial listings. At the same time, paid listings (the ones that have four additional links underneath them) do not have the rel="nofollow" attribute. A bit of a controversial move on Business.com's part seeing that this attribute was originally intended for paid links and not editorial type of links.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2006/07/businesscom-bass-ackwards-use-of-nofollow-attribute.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

