<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SearchRank Blog &#187; Digg</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchrank.com/blog/tag/digg/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchrank.com/blog</link>
	<description>Featuring news, opinion and commentary related to the industry of search engines and marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:33:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://www.searchrank.com/blog/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Would Digg As a Whole Survive Its Own Policy on Digging and Burying?</title>
		<link>http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2007/05/would-digg-survive-its-own-policies.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2007/05/would-digg-survive-its-own-policies.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 20:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Wallace</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://174.133.136.242/blog/?p=340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stoney deGeyter poses this question at E-Marketing Performance. Subject to the reasons why Diggers will bury an article, would Digg itself survive? What is the supposed reasoning behind the process of burying a story?

   1. Duplicate Story
   2. Spam
   3. Wrong topic
   4. Inaccurate
   5. OK, this is lame]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchrank.com/blog/2007/05/would-digg-survive-its-own-policies.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

